I turns out I burn away a kilometer of travel for every four minutes or so of running my van’s engine just to power the air-conditioner while stationary. Talk about a rude awakening.
I constantly keep track of fuel mileage. After all, any decrease in kilometers per liter I’d observe would signal a need for cleaning, adjusting, replacing or replenishing something on my vehicle. And, all would be good if I didn’t give in to running the engine for minutes on end just to run the AC and get some fleeting relief from the summer heat.
I lead an office-van life, you see, and at some day hours the lighter-jacked electric fan I use simply can’t cut it. I’ve taken to rationing my AC breaks, using my stopwatch to dole out 10 minute stretches of the engine idling and the air-conditioner running with my face just inches from the vents. But, that nod to conservation, that painful shut-off after 600 seconds of cool bliss, begs the question: how much am I giving up in mileage for every minute of guilt-ridden, ozone-burning running in place?
I finally dusted off the old algebra to come up with numbers I could believe and work with. With my 1.2 Liter gasoline-burning minivan, I move around at an average of 40km/h and at 2,500rpm in city traffic. From this I figured out that it takes just 4 minutes and 10 seconds to burn off a kilometer’s worth of fuel while idling the engine to run the AC. This roughly translates to 2 and a half kilometers of travel lost for every 10 minutes of idling, 5 kilometers for 20 minutes, 10 kilometers for 40 minutes, and a major commute’s 15 kilometers for 60 minutes or an hour of idle running.
See below for the math I used … needless to say, precise or not, I’ve taken to short walks outside my vehicle instead switching on the ignition.
A–average time to cover 1 kilometer in city traffic = (1km / (40km/h/60minute)) = (1km / 0.667 km/minute) = 1.5 minutes per kilometer
B–average rpm in city traffic at 40km/h = 2500 rpm or revs/minute
C–average revolutions per kilometer in city traffic = A x B = 1.5 minutes/km x 2500 revs/minute = 3750 revolutions per kilometer
D–idling rpm with AC on = 900 rpm or revs/minute
E–minutes idling equivalent to a kilometer traveled = C / D = 3750 revs per km / 900 rpm = 4.1667 minutes idling equivalent to 1km traveled
F–schedule of idling minutes to equivalent kilometers traveled = Total revolutions / C … 10 minutes @ 900 rpm = 9,000 revs –> 2.4 km traveled 20 minutes @ 900 rpm = 18,000 revs –> 4.8 km traveled 40 minutes @ 900 rpm = 36,000 revs –> 9.6 km traveled 60 minutes @ 900 rpm = 54,000 revs –> 14.4 km traveled
Using artificial intelligence (AI) and pervasive mobile connectivity, the Honda Motor Company of Japan intends to prevent all traffic collision deaths involving their cars and motorcycles by 2050. AI would provide driver assistance on individual vehicles while mobile connectivity between multiple vehicles would predict and manage risks using a rich realtime picture of shared road conditions.
TOKYO, Japan, November 25, 2021–Honda Motor Co., Ltd. today held the world premiere of advanced future safety technologies Honda is currently developing for the realization of a society where everyone sharing the road will be liberated from the risk of traffic collisions and enjoy freedom of mobility with total peace of mind.
Honda will strive to attain its goal of realizing “zero traffic collision fatalities involving Honda motorcycles and automobiles globally by 2050” utilizing two key technologies. One is the world’s first*1 artificial intelligence (AI)-powered “Intelligent Driver-Assistive Technology” providing assistance that is suited to the ability and situation of each individual to reduce driving errors and risks, helping the driver achieve safe and sound driving. The other is the “Safe and Sound Network Technology” which connects all road users, both people and mobility products, through telecommunications, making it possible to predict potential risks and help people avoid such risks before collisions actually occur.
Realization of “zero traffic collision fatalities by 2050”
Striving for a collision-free society for everyone sharing the road, represented by the global safety slogan “Safety for Everyone,” Honda has been pursuing the research and development of safety technologies from the perspective of both hardware and software.
For the pursuit of a collision-free society, Honda will expand the introduction of Honda SENSING 360, a recently announced omni-directional safety and driver-assistive system, to all models to go on sale in all major markets by 2030. Moreover, Honda will continue working to expand application of a motorcycle detection function and further enhance functions of its ADAS (advanced driver-assistance system).
Furthermore, Honda also will continue to make progress in expanding application of motorcycle safety technologies and offering of safety education technologies (Honda Safety EdTech). Through these initiatives, Honda will strive to reduce global traffic collision fatalities involving Honda motorcycles and automobiles by half*2 by 2030. Beyond that, Honda will strive to realize its ambitious goal of “zero traffic collision fatalities by 2050” through establishment of future safety technologies at the earliest possible timing.
1) Safety suited to each individual:
Aiming for “zero human error” in driving with the “Intelligent Driver-Assistive Technology”
Honda has unraveled the factors behind human errors through its original fMRI*3-based study of the human brain and analysis of risk-taking behaviors.
The system presumes predictors of driving errors based on information obtained through a driver monitoring camera and pattern of the driving operations.
This technology is being developed to enable each individual driver to mitigate driving errors and enjoy mobility without any sense of anxiety.
Honda will strive for establishment of underlying technologies during the first half of the 2020s, with practical application during the second half of the 2020s.
With the goal to unravel underlying causes of driving errors that make the driver feel anxious, Honda has been conducting research and development of “technologies to understand people” with an original method that utilizes fMRI*3.
In addition to technologies to understand human behavior and conditions, which Honda has amassed to date, the “Intelligent Driver-Assistive Technology” unveiled today, the world’s first such technology, uses ADAS sensors and cameras to recognize potential risks in the vehicle’s surroundings, which enables AI to detect driving risks. At the same time, AI will determine optimal driving behavior on a real-time basis and offer assistance suited to the cognitive state and traffic situations of each individual driver.
With the next-generation driver-assistive functions currently under research and development, Honda will strive to offer the new value of “error-free” safety and peace of mind which are suited to the driving behavior and situation of each individual driver and keep them away from any potential risks.
Three values Honda will offer with its next-generation driver assist technology
No driving operation errors (Operational assist): Vehicle offers AI-based assist to reduce drifting and prevent a delay in operations.
No oversight / No prediction errors (Cognitive assist): Vehicle communicates risks with visual, tactile and auditory sensations.
Technologies in R&D phase: Risk indicator, seatbelt control and 3D audio
No errors due to daydreaming and careless driving (Attentiveness assist): Vehicle helps reduce driver fatigue / drowsiness
Technologies in R&D phase: Bio feedback / vibration stimulus through the seatback
From here onward, Honda will further advance the “Intelligent Driver-Assistive Technology” unveiled today and continue making progress in development with the goal to establish underlying technologies during the first half of the 2020s, then launch practical applications during the second half of the 2020s.
With this technology, Honda will advance the conventional driver assist which helps the driver avoid risk while it is occurring to the AI-powered driver assist which will keep the driver away from the risks and strive to completely eliminate human errors, which are the cause of over 90% of traffic collisions*4.
2) Safe coexistence of all road users:
Establishment of the “Safe and Sound Network Technology” which connects all road users through telecommunication
System understands / recognizes the situation and surrounding environment of each driver and road user
Through the communication network, information about potential risks in the traffic environment will be aggregated in the server, and risks are predicted using the reproduction of the traffic environment in the virtual space.
System derives the most appropriate support information, communicates it to each road user and encourages them to take actions to avoid potential risk before it actually happens.
Honda will accelerate industry-wide and public-private collaboration with an aim to standardize the technology in the second half of the 2020s.
To realize a “collision-free” mobility society for all road users, Honda is striving to realize a “cooperative safety society” where utilization of telecommunication technologies will enable everyone sharing the road to be connected and coexist.
With the “Safe and Sound Technology,” information about potential risks in the traffic environment, which are detected based on information obtained from roadside cameras, on-board cameras and smartphones, will be aggregated in the server to reproduce that traffic environment in the virtual space. In that virtual space, in consideration of the conditions and characteristics of each individual road user, the system predicts / simulates the behaviors of road users at high risk of a collision. Then, the system derives the most appropriate support information to help the road users avoid risks.
Such support information will be communicated intuitively to automobile drivers, motorcycle riders and pedestrians through “cooperative risk HMI (human-machine interface),” which will make it possible for the system to encourage road users to take action to avoid a collision before it happens.
Aiming for real-world implementation of this technology after 2030, Honda will build the system and complete verification of effectiveness in the first half of the 2020s, then accelerate industry-wide and public-private collaboration with an aim to standardize the technology in the second half of the 2020s.
Comments by Keiji Ohtsu, President and Representative Director of Honda R&D Co., Ltd.:
“Striving to completely eliminate mobility risks for everyone sharing the road, Honda will offer safety and peace of mind of each and every road user as a new value. Applying our future safety technologies which will embody such new value, Honda will work toward the realization of ‘zero traffic collision fatalities’ involving Honda motorcycles and automobiles globally by 2050. For the realization of a collision-free society where all road users care for each other and the freedom of mobility becomes possible, we will further accelerate our industry-wide and public-private initiatives.”
*1 Honda internal research
*2 Reduce traffic collision fatalities involving Honda motorcycles and automobiles per 10,000 units sold by 50% by 2030 compared to 2020.
*3 The functional magnetic resonance imaging, fMRI (One of the methods to obtain images of brain’s functioning areas based on changes in blood flow.)
*4 Source: “Number of Fatalities in Traffic Accidents By Type of Violations of Laws,” White Paper on Traffic Safety in Japan 2017
Just in case you’re wondering, if you’re lucky enough to ride one of the newer P2P buses, the one with individual LCD panels, one for each passenger … yes, you CAN charge your phone off the USB port. 🙂
Transport is an ordeal to the wheelchair-bound. They can be independent, they struggle to be independent, in many cases had been fully independent before affliction or old age had assailed them. But the few centimeters putting a vehicle’s cabin on a different plane from pavement is what always brings them back to needing the intimate kindness of others.
There’s the innate altruism, of course, there’s always someone willing to help, some family member, friend, or even the occasional bystander suddenly beset with the impulse to assist although seldom having the knowledge how to. That isn’t really the problem. In fact, ironically and unfairly to those who would volunteer to help, it’s the readiness of good souls to help that’s the rub. Already disabled, them needing to be carried into and out of a vehicle, their presumption of such help, further and repeatedly hobbles their dignity.
This continuing ordeal for a mother was what pushed her children to set up PBC Car Adapt, Inc. in November 2003. Thrice weekly she had to go to hospital for therapy. A minimum of three times a week and each way, she braved having to be carried onto and off a vehicle seat, casually separated from a wheelchair that had become her legs.
The family found a solution, a system that objectified the process, replacing servile help with servo mechanics. The Carony wheelchair system offered a way to automate their mother’s boarding and disembarking from a vehicle, turning it into a pushbutton affair, empowering her with the ability to push that button herself.
The system centers on a modular wheelchair, its chair meant to be disengaged from the wheel chassis, and lifted and swivelled into or out of a vehicle. The chair-bound passenger no longer has to be separated from what is engineered to be a portable yet safe and comfortable car seat. And the system is brand-neutral—it could be installed in any number of automotive makes and models, in compact or larger vehicle types from sedans to SUVs.
The problem was that they couldn’t simply buy the gear off-the-shelf. They could purchase the equipment, sure, but it had to be installed in a vehicle by an exclusive distributor. At the time, there were no such distributors here and their only option was to buy both the vehicle and the wheelchair system abroad, have these mated there, and import the entire finished product into the country.
Fortunately, the family had the means but not the frivolousness to even consider such a course of action. Instead, with full appreciation of how the Carony wheelchair system could be as valuable to others as it was for them, they gave body to their conviction, incorporated PBC Car Adapt, and themselves became that elusive distributor that they needed to be here, in-country.
They became the country distributor of Carony systems-maker Autoadapt of Sweden, making the Philippines only the second country in Asia, after Japan, to have gained this distributorship. Now, almost 14 years down the road, their product line up already includes equipment to make vehicles operable by paraplegic drivers, fitting these out with hands-only boarding and driving systems.
You could visit their source’s website at autoadapt.com to see the solutions they provide, or point your browser at pbccaradapt.ph and see how they’ve registered their domain name but haven’t gone all-in commercial with online retail. But if the wheelchair systems they carry sound to you like tangible solutions for a particular someone’s everyday ordeal, we suggest that you simply call their Quezon City office at +632 881 6664 or +632 455 5929.
Look for managing partner Juliet “Jet” Quiemel, daughter to the lady who started them down this road, or for Christine, the buoyant daughter and granddaughter to them both. Call and ask them about how they’ve matter-of-factly championed the cause of the disabled all these years. And, if you decide to get their help, say that you heard of them through Real World Drive and tell them that we endorse to you the modest referral fee they offered us … take it as a small discount, with our compliments.
The GrabTrike option on the Grab app could serve as your online resource for holding tricycles to the fare matrix that’s probably posted for public reference but only in locations familiar to locals. Regulated by local government units, tricycle fares are intended to be fair. That’s a given. But with no easy access, no quick read on what these fares ought to be, the commuter is basically at the mercy of the tricycle driver and the prices he may quote.
It’s something that comes with a learning curve, figuring out standard fare after several trips to similar points, over what seem like equivalent distances. But when you disembark from long haul transport and want to take the countryside’s equivalent to the city’s taxicabs, that’s when asking around for how much so-and-so costs becomes a big old canary—something that marks you as, well, as a mark.
So, you usually just get in the trike, trying to look like a local, and then just ask how much fare is when you get at your destination, like it was just a lapse in memory. If the fare sounds exorbitant, you have the option of haggling and maybe making a scene, but you’re already behind the curve at that point.
Enter GrabTrike. Even if you end up not actually using the service, firing up the Grab app and thumbing in origin and destination points, will show you the estimated fare for your trip (add the P25 Grab fee if you want to actually book it, or save it if you don’t). Presto! You’ve got a number to work with.
Here a suggestion for going native: if you want to keep looking like a local, round off the number to the nearest P5. Say it like, “di ba P65 lang?!” if the driver looks like he’s trying to pull the wool over your eyes. Even if the right fare is pesos less, you get to leave behind a consolation tip.
So far, Grab has been able to deploy the service only in Pampanga. If you think about it, their efforts to represent obscure fare matrices with their simplifying algorithms are already a public service in itself. Here’s hoping they roll out GrabTrike in other locales as well, and soon.
And, come to think of it, the same argument can be said of GrabTaxi where taxicabs do ply city streets. Even if you don’t actually use the service, running their app and checking the estimated fare for your trip gives you a fair estimate, sans the booking fee, assuming traffic conditions stay generally the same from start to finish.
WWW, 24 April 2017—Google co-founder Larry Page has revealed the Kitty Hawk Flyer, tweeting a YouTube video showing its prototype being flown by outdoorsman and freelance writer Cimeron Morrissey. The prototype Kitty Hawk Flyer is an all-electric single-passenger octocopter that’s classified an ultralight, does not require a pilot’s license to operate, and can be flown only for recreation in uncongested areas, only over fresh water lakes and rivers. Developed by the Zee Aero division of the Kitty Hawk Corporation, the actual production model is promised to have a different look and feel from the prototype, and to go on sale by the end of this year.
With expectations raised by the involvement of Page, particularly with his work on Google’s self-driving car initiative, what has been spun up as his “flying car” project has delivered a vehicle that’s been described as coming up short on its promise. The significance of the Kitty Hawk Flyer is, after all, overshadowed by the announcement of other, bigger vehicles coming out soon in commercial numbers—air cars spec’d out to carry numerous passengers on road-bound city commutes and airborne intercity hops. In comparison to these commuter solutions that aim to become Jetsons-inspired futuristic mainstays, the Flyer presents as a, well, as a toy.
But, the thing about it that’s in plain sight, what obscures its role in shaping what private airborne transport can become, what makes it fly under the radar, so to speak, is what makes the Kitty Hawk Flyer’s manned flight a game changer. Bigger contenders, those that seem to fit the “flying car” template better, work off century-old engineering. These still use internal combustion engines to produce propeller-driven thrust, and fixed- or auto-rotating wings to generate lift. In contrast, with the Kitty Hawk Flyer, it may look like a seat was just grafted onto a scaled up drone, but it’s the first personal flyer concept evolved from this fairly new, multi-copter platform that’s being used, so far, only for unmanned flight.
Better context for appreciating the Kitty Hawk Flyer would be the jetpack. Futurists of the past had played with this personal, liquid-fuel rocket pack. It had its fair share of Hollywood appearances, in James Bond and off-beat race flicks, but the jetpack had endurance measured in seconds and could be flown only by stunt doubles, by brave and expert expendables. Now comes the Kitty Hawk Flyer with relatively mundane electric fans replacing the ignition of exotic rocket fuel, and with flight time extended to practical and useful minutes.
With the last century’s jetpack, there was little incentive to bridge and exploit that gap between a personal rocket and a full-blown orbital booster. The authorities can’t be expected to tolerate fire-spouting projectiles sending folks on personal trips tracing criss-crossing ballistic trajectories. But now, with the Kitty Hawk Flyer looking like commonplace drones and driven by non-volatile electrics, there’s no hint of the fantastic in the notion of larger, more serious electric multi-copters eventually coming online for near future commuters.
Dubbed a “selfie-expert,” the OPPO F1s proved its worth as a handy laptop and camera replacement, on the job and covering the bustling opening of the 2016 Philippine International Motor Show last month.
Day one of the 2016 Philippine International Motor Show (PIMS), original 29mp photo taken with steady-hand pan on OPPO F1s in panorama mode
Convergence in smartphones happened because of key components being leveraged for wider utility, and after end-users accepted these as useful substitutes for bigger, dedicated gear. When sharper, colored screens came online, that’s when vendors got to thinking, “what if we add a camera, the parts are small enough compared to the whole package, and we now have the same screen, even better than the ones on point and shoot digicams.” And it’s the consequences of convergence that vendors are now capitalizing on to establish distinctions between otherwise identical smartphone slabs.
The camera phone brought the selfie phenomenon, and some vendors went with it full tilt early on. OPPO of China is now the number two brand in the country, likely precipitated by Samsung’s Note 7 crisis, but also intentional after they launched their mainstreamed selfie-centric F1 series last February. Departing from the gimmicky take of their N3 swivelling camera phone, the F1 simply puts top tier auto-focusing cameras both in the rear and in front. Both cameras have large sensors, big fast apertures and sharp auto-focus, and can be put through radical post-shoot filters for pro-looking, airbrushed portraiture.
The latest model in the series, the F1s, bumps up against mid-range parameters with some premium specs that put it unabashedly in the new selfie mainstream. Good as the rear camera is with its fast phase-detect auto-focus (PDAF), big open f/2.2 aperture and exceptionally large 1/3” sensor delivering 13mp photos, the front camera is even better with its 16mp output. Overtly a typical slate phone, that inverted asymmetry in camera specs is the only sign that the OPPO F1s is selfie-centered gear.
A sealed brick, there’s no rear panel to remove to get to the slots. The battery is fixed and your SD card and sim modules fit onto a small slideout tray you can pop out with a pin key that comes with the kit. The phone’s heft is proof of a rigid metal frame for the slim case, weighing it down nicely in a confident grip shaped by OPPO’s trademark chamfering. The front of the slab is reassuringly dense with the smooth mineral feel of 2.5D Corning Gorilla Glass 4.
Their Color OS 3.0 fork of Android 5.1 is layered on top of an octa-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 CPU and Mali-T860MP2 GPU controlled by a Mediatek MT6750 chipset, the processing package working off a roomy 3GB of fast accessing LPDDR3 memory backstopped by 32GB of fixed storage that’s of course expandable by micro SD. The tech package seems well integrated, no hangs or unexplained slowdowns, and although the 3075mAh Li-Po battery is short of having exceptional capacity, it does get you through a heavy work day.
The cameras on this puppy beg pushing, not just for self-portraits but also for full-blown photo work, and particularly because of its solid build and tech package. It’s simply too handy to trade for a camera when coverage starts happening, its smartphone connected utility stands ready to close the loop on getting the photos published in a full story.
For print work, raw resolution on both cameras fall short of the 19mp needed for a magazine’s full, two-page spread, but all F1 series phones (the F1, F1 Plus and the F1s) have Ultra HD as well as panorama modes to render images up to as much as 51mp. Ultra HD does a rapid series of either three or six shots for a single scene. These shot sets are then processed to interpolate more detail into the scene, delivering either 23 or 51mp images, respectively. It won’t conjure up the same sharpness as on a large sensor DSLR, but the enhanced details are there with fuzziness in the edges that doesn’t add to what happens with ink on paper in print reproduction.
Detail on a photo of the Lexus LC 500 h on exhibit at 2016 PIMS, original 51mp image taken with OPPO F1s in Ultra HD mode
Auto-focus / auto-exposure (AF/AE) metering points are easily selected with on-screen taps, the reticle staying on the selected point to conveniently confirm things. Chosen properly, those AF/AE points always yield sharp, accurately colored and well saturated images. And because the FIs doesn’t prevent shutter clicks at any point, there’s this lag window you can exploit after focus sharpens and before exposure is adjusted.
Stay alert and quick on the draw, you can simulate having manual override of settings while getting realtime, what-you-see-is-what-you-get feedback from the sharp 1080p screen. Tap first on the a mid-grey item in your sight picture to adjust the metering, then tap on your actual focus point and click it before the metering also adjusts to the new target.
If you’re dealing with a moving subject, there’s AF/AE lock to work with. Press long on a metering point to lock up settings (the screen showing the reticle labeled “AF/AE lock”), you can pre-set focus and meter at a point where you want your subject to be sharp on a dynamic panning shot. Lock on a dark spot and it slows down shutter speed enough to get that 1/15th of a second or slower that you’ll need for motion blur.
If you want to push things even more, there’s a set of controls in expert mode for manual focusing, ISO selection, long exposures starting at one second, and even the pro’s grail feature of raw image capture.
The Lexus LC 500 h on a rotating turnstile at PIMS 2016, with post shoot auto-levels adjustment on an original image taken with the OPPO F1s in expert mode, ISO set to 100, manually focused with onscreen slider, and set to slow 1 second exposure
Proof of OPPO smarts in many ways, the F1s is as sharp as they come in its mid-range segment. Introduced last August at an SRP of PhP12,999, the entire first-delivery allotment was sold out within days of a splashy launch that flooded social media with images of celebrity influencers hamming it up for new normal selfies.
It’s come a long way, that front camera meant for video calls back when MMS was the big thing. For a while there, front cameras packed just enough resolution to make a face recognizable on those tiny candy bar phone screens, pixels numbering in the low hundreds on each side.
Throw in the Internet with high-speed data calls and with WiFi hotspots, simmer things with a few more years of social network start-ups and obsessions, and it’s now about stills and videos of them phone owners, of the hands that wield the handsets, as it were. Shot from arm’s reach or at stick’s length, these images now preoccupy both shooters and viewers everywhere, everyday. Now phones have front cameras with resolutions that rival those of rear cameras, even match the main cameras on models down a rung or two on the price-point ladder. We’re talkin’ serious megapixels these days, both in back and at the front. Eventually, things got even more dizzying when some folks finally took those secondary, fixed-focus front cameras out of the equation.
From selfie swinger
OPPO’s swivel camera N3
Remember when the OPPO N1, then later the N3, burst onto the scene? Here were camera phones that tipped their hats, literally and figuratively, to the selfie phenomenon. First time ever, that primary rear-facing camera was put on swivels so that it can be pivoted front for some high grade self-portraits. The quirky swivelling autofocus cameras ended up upstaging everything else about those phones, but the thing about those OPPO N’s, what sneaked in amidst the guffaws, was how these objectified, even institutionalized, the selfie impulse, how these legitimized overt acts of self-absorption with blatant, selfie-specific designs. Call them OPPO’s conspicuous, slow-burn response to what Ellen Degeneres and friends made way cool, hamming it up at the Oscars way back then.
Ultimate selfie phones, those OPPO N’s were dubbed. But that tag line has gotten tired—acknowledged and made hackneyed by, well, by every major brand really. Now, them swivelling, swingin’ selfie guys at OPPO have launched a new line that makes things subtle again, dunks the rabbit back in the hat, and goes back to front camera roots, but bringing along rear camera bells.
Back to sleek slab
OPPO Philippines’ official launch of the F1 at Trinoma Mall, February 17
The F1’s widgets for control of its main, rear camera (note the ones for Expert mode and Raw capture)
Introduced here just this Wednesday, the F1 is dubbed the “Selfie Expert.” While nursing my old timer’s aversion to that “Selfie” qualifier, I’ll have to admit that the thing has the sophistication an “Expert” would want and need. On this new upper mid-range model, the mainstay rear camera has a 13mp sensor behind a fast f/2.2 aperture in the kind of lens I’ve come to equate with OPPO—you can rely on them for good glass at certain price points. And the controls that get added on as removable widgets on OPPO’s proprietary Color OS, tell the tale of an advanced camera engine. There’s RAW capture and Expert mode, stuff you’d go looking for if you need to do your own post-shoot processing on images done the old way, forcing focus points and pushing f-stops, while dealing with new-fangled white balance settings we never had to bother with on film. And, with phase detecting autofocus (PDAF), half-press to shutter-click on the F1’s main camera could be as fast as on new mirror-less pro cams.
Widgets for the F1’s front camera … you might want to disable the Beauty one to get the most from the sharp autofocus
Now, with the F1, they’ve put that “Expert” halo on the front “Selfie” camera as well. On its front camera, the upper mid-range F1 at its P11,990 SRP has features you’d expect but not really find, not completely, on the rear of rival mid-range offerings. First off, the thing has sharp autofocus, something I verified personally, hands-on intimately, since it wasn’t in the literature. You’ll think twice about using the default Beauty filter for selfies, maybe disable the algorithms that automatically air-brush faces, and keep images uniquely sharp and gritty, particularly for dramatic black and whites.
The F1’s front camera has an even faster f/2.0 aperture and an 84 degree angle-of-view that means it has the equivalent of a wide angle 22mm lens on a film or full frame camera—good for ambient light work that’ll get a handful of folks into a close-up selfie. The 8mp front camera has a 1/4” sensor, a wafer 4mm diagonally across that’s half again as big as the 1/6” or 2.67mm used on most other phones, on either of their front or rear cameras. That 8mp on a 4mm sensor is smaller than the 16mp on the exceptionally large 7mm sensor of their swivel-camera N3, but things are kept nicely proportionate. Half the resolution on a sensor that’s nearly half across compared to those featured by their class-defying top-end phone, you just know OPPO made sure the F1’s mid-range hardware is up to scratch for what the software boasts to deliver.With the conventional looking, two-camera F1, they’ve morphed their best camera tech into a mid-range slab phone that makes things solidly monolithic again, no more fragile sub-assemblies to swivel a single camera, back to looking understated and keenly sharp with the excellent build quality OPPO has become known for. The screen is protected behind hard 2.5D Gorilla Glass 4, while the mirror finish on the caseback of OPPO’s Neo and Mirror models gives way to the F1’s satin metal that’s now de-rigeur on anything premium. You’ll want to find a protective case pronto—if you want hassle-free tosses into pockets and purses—but OPPO has got you covered. Says so in the specs, you’ll find a case in there when you unbox the F1.
Mainstreamed in other ways
Last Wednesday was a real news day about OPPO hitting its stride, creating new elements in the mainstream, joining the old guard in some ways. With the introduction of the F1, OPPO Philippines also announced critical, much awaited telco alliances.
The other shoe we’ve been waiting to drop, OPPO’s finally linking-up with major telcos, has finally hit the ground. The OPPO F1 is now available on Smart’s postpaid All-in Plan 1200, and bundled with Smart prepaid kits offering nice freebies for six months—50MB of free data usage monthly, and P150 bonus load for every P250 of accumulated top-ups each month, with both data and load freebies valid for half a year. OPPO’s lower mid-range Neo 5s is now also available on Sun Cellular’s postpaid Best Value Plan 450 that features unlimited Sun calls and texts, and 250mb of free data usage and 250 free text messages to other networks each month. And we have OPPO Philippines Operations Manager Garrick Hung saying that a tie-up with Globe Telecom is “in the works.”
OPPO Philippines Operations Manager Garrick Hung delivering the much awaited news about telco tie-ups
OPPO again partners up with global consumer-finance provider Home Credit to offer yet another way to acquire an F1. They partnered up last year to put the OPPO Neo 7 on promo. This time around, from February 19 to March 31 and at 245 partner stores nationwide, consumers can get the F1 on a Home Credit installment plan for as low as P1,299 per month for six months. Not a credit card transaction, just a valid ID could start things rolling on a Home Credit purchasing loan.
For their F-0’s AMT variant, what BYD did was bolt a Magneti Marelli kit onto the same 5-speed manual gearbox of the micro-hatchback’s MT variants. Like other carmakers in China (and also in India, by the way), BYD found that an automated manual transmission, an AMT, is a cost-effective way to, well, to automate most or some of the stickwork on a manual gearbox. It isn’t an automatic transmission built from the ground up, but rather a distinct module bolted onto a manual box, adding logic controllers and servos to work both the clutch and the gearshift.
There’s no clutch pedal to work with. All clutchwork is delegated to the electronic shifter, leaving just the brake and gas pedals. And, about that gas pedal, the AMT also overrides your throttle inputs as it works the clutch, letting up on the gas as it pulls back the clutch for a shift, then bringing the gas back to where you had it as it lets the clutch back in to engage the new gear.
Magneti Marelli AMT unit
It’s an entirely different experience compared to auto-shifts on a conventional AT where the fluid link of the torque converter allows shifting on the fly without any let up on the throttle, not even when stepping through gears in semi-auto mode. But it’s definitely a sequence that’s familiar to the stick savvy.
In forward drive, the F-0 AMT has three modes—A, S and M:
A for full automatic operation, the gearbox taking care of all shifting from first to fifth. From the N (neutral) starting position, sliding the stick down will spring it into the very center of the selector, putting F-0 in A.
S for a sportier sequence on the automatic shifting, the box keeping you in each particular gear longer, milking its torque advantage as you accelerate up. Clicking the S button while the F-0 is already in A puts it in sport mode. Clicking the button again toggles it back from S to A.
M for a manual mode that let’s you roll out in 1st or 2nd (for driving off in snow conditions) and sequentially shift up or down through all five gears. Coming out of N or R (reverse) puts you A by default. But then after, even with the car already moving, flicking the stick left and letting it spring back to the center will toggle you into M, and flicking it again puts you back in A.
in neutral
from neutral to normal AUTOMATED mode
click the button to toggle into and out of SPORT automated mode
shifting to REVERSE
flick left and let the stick spring back to center to toggle to and from MANUAL mode
flick up to shift up in M mode
flick down to shift down in M mode
Showed up by software
When I had driven the MT variant last year on a real world mission, an outreach drive as usual but for a different publisher, I found the F-0 thoroughly enjoyable (see the story: The BYD F0, on the job). The wheelbase’s rectangle is relatively short and wide, the overhangs on the body are minimal both front and back, and those wheels set nearly at its corners make for a very responsive city car that’s sized just right for zipping around the metropolis.
So, I thought I found a way to both eat and have the proverbial cake by nailing down a shift sequence to run the peppy hatchback as efficiently as possible. Noting that the F-0’s 67hp 998cc engine spools up very quickly with its three cylinders, revving up easily from under 1000rpm to almost 4000rpm with just normal pressure on the gas pedal, I asserted that minding the revs and up-shifting at 3000rpm as the micro-hatch hits 20, 40, 60 and 70km/h to reach 5th gear, would put it in it’s best fuel-saving groove.
But, as it turns out, I was wrong. Working with the same gear ratios as on the manual box, that 3000rpm shift-point I had pegged is where the AMT would have you in its more aggressive S mode, with shifts happening at a similar 20, 40, 60 and 80km/h. In contrast, in normal A mode, the F-0’s AMT programming defaults to extreme economy, its logic and fast electronic controller managing to deliver an even more frugal shift sequence.
No sir, 2000 is better
In A, the automated gearbox emulates how an eco-run master would short-shift for optimal fuel savings. Normal, easy pressure on the gas pedal gets you to shift points as soon as revs hit 2000rpm: up to 2nd gear by the time you hit 15km/h, then up to 3rd by 25, to 4th by 45, and finally up to 5th gear by the time you hit 60km/h. Obviously a max-conserve regimen to get to the top overdrive gear quickly and even at a low 60km/h that’s arguably the highest speed at which you can occasionally cruise in city traffic.
At 2,000rpm with its fairly flat power curve, the F-0’s BYD 371QA engine already delivers 86% or 57lb-ft of its peak torque of 66lb-ft at 4000rpm. It really is enough for getting you to the next shift point. The problem is, with the throttle so responsive on the MT variant, that 2000rpm comes and goes very quickly—difficult to hit when you’re minding a stick. But with the drive-by-wire controllers on the AMT kit, triggering things at 2000 is just routine of course.
My best on the MT variant was 16km/l. On the F-0 AMT, with full credit going to Magneti Marelli engineers, I saw that number being nudged up to almost 18km/l.
Still a clutch in there
If you remember that an AMT still has a clutch to manage, then its operation becomes predictable. I’m saying that’s a good thing. If you’re an old stick guy, like many of us are, you’ll be looking out for when and how the AMT box will be easing off and pushing in the clutch while it does its autonomous thing with the gearshift.
On rolling out, shifting from N down to A will put the F-0 in gear only if you’re stepping on the brakes at the time. If you forget this and, perhaps, put it in A not while stepping on the brakes but rather with the parking brake engaged, it won’t put you in gear. The stick selector will be in the center position where it should be but the dash display will show you as being still in N. Remember this and don’t panic when you might be coming off the handbrake instead of the brake pedal (like when you move again in stop-and-go traffic). Simply step on the brakes, then cycle the stick to N then back to A. That’ll put you in gear.
Now, with the car in gear, the dash display showing that telltale A, you’ll notice no urging forward like what you’d feel on a conventional AT with its torque converter already engaged. Reason is that the AMT’s program will start easing in the clutch only when you take your foot off the brake. Quite natural really, like what you’d do on a manual transmission.
But you can still use that old handbrake trick when rolling out from an uphill hang. Just do what you’d normally do after shifting the selector in drive while stepping on the brake. Engage the handbrake, step off the brake pedal, and then give it a little gas in A before disengaging the handbrake as well.
Jerky only if you’re passive
As the car accelerates and cycles through its upshifts, the AMT will execute each one as you yourself would if you had full control of the clutch and the gearshift. When it hits a shift point, it’ll override your throttle control, idling down the engine to prevent it racing as it eases back on the clutch. Only with the engine idled and the clutch disengaged will it then actually change gears. Afterwards, it’ll reengage the clutch then give you back full control of the throttle. Keeping your foot pressed down on the gas pedal through this evolution will cause what critics have called that “jerky” AMT acceleration.
With a gear shift completed, the gearbox will restore full throttle control, putting the engine revs instantly back where your foot on the gas tells the AMT to put it. What’s this like? Have you seen the movie Apollo 13, particularly the part when their first stage booster cuts out and the second stage suddenly comes on to take over? It’s like that. You’d feel a sudden absence of acceleration as the AMT starts into a shift, followed half a second later by its equally sudden return. But, again, that’s only if you keep pressing on the gas pedal the same way throughout the gear change.
If you visualize what you’d be doing on a manual gearbox and fall back on muscle memory, you can rely on instinct to ease off the pedal as soon as you sense the engine idling down in preparation for a gear shift, imagine that familiar “one-one thousand” second’s count, and bring back the gas gradually when and instead of thinking “thousand.” (Remember? It takes just a half and not a whole second.)
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxhsda0F1dI&w=480&align=right]And then there’s the option of simply putting things in M and going through old familiar motions for accelerating with a manual gearbox, only this time without having to worry about a clutch pedal. Also, with the AMT in M, gear shifts could actually happen faster. Instead of the engine starting to idle down only when the AMT triggers an upshift, accelerating in M mode means you can ease off the gas pedal before and in anticipation of your triggering an upshift yourself. The AMT won’t anymore have to wait for the engine to spool down before easing off the clutch, executing your gear shift command, and then again reengaging the clutch.
Economical to a fault
Economy-focused A mode on the AMT won’t give in to impulsive sprints, keeping you in the current gear even as you suddenly push harder on the gas pedal. On conventional automatics, the common response is a downshift for multiplied torque as the RPM spike translates this into horsepower. Not so with the AMT, not in A and neither in S mode.
If you think about it, it really is better to keep the AMT in the same gear, even when you need some sudden acceleration. Remember that any shift triggers disengaging the clutch while idling down the engine. Imagine what this would imply when you suddenly need some powerful acceleration. The AMT will oblige, ironically, by first throttling down the engine for the half second it needs to complete a gear change. Nope, not an ideal scenario.
Somewhat related to this, A mode will keep you in a particular gear as long as it keeps you moving along at the gear’s corresponding minimum speed, regardless of not being able to accelerate beyond it. This makes for some hair-raising episodes when you’re going uphill. An A mode’s short-shifting sequence, while good enough on level ground, could cause a sudden loss of critical gear reduction as you deal with a climb. Instead of speeding through a climb on a lower gear, an untimely up shift would likely keep you at a low speed, not letting you accelerate further for the duration of the uphill run … makes for a lot of horn-honking at your back.
Now, to deal with these shortcomings of the AMT when compared to conventional AT’s, it might’ve crossed your mind to keep it in S mode full-time. But notice that while this may pre-empt any problems in uphill climbs, it doesn’t really give you the the downshift option for those occasions when you need a burst of acceleration, occasions like on overtakes to get out from behind slower vehicles. So, I’d suggest going back to basics, going to M mode instead. Do a quick left flick on the selector to put the AMT in manual M mode, then a quick down flick to downshift.
Best practices using an AMT’s best programming
Notice how many times I went into the benefits of M above those of other modes? There’s the bit where I mention going with M to sidestep acceleration jerkiness. And there’s the part just above where I suggest M mode as being the answer for the AMT’s acceleration shortfalls. Admittedly, I started out thinking it’s best to just keep it in M, commanding the gear changes myself while still enjoying the break from having to work a clutch pedal.
But in the end, after logging about 250km on the F-0, I’d suggest keeping it in A mode instead. Just build on old muscle memory to learn a new set of instincts for easing off the gas pedal when the gearbox idles down the throttle and come back in with the gas only after it completes a gear change. This way, you reap all the fuel-saving benefits of the AMT while enjoying its clutchless operation. Consume less fuel than with a conventional AT while still enjoying its clutch automation, what’s not to like?
Stay in A, but be ready to flick things into M real quick. When you need powerful acceleration, instead of finger-hunting for the S switch, better to then finally go into M mode with an easy, sightless left flick on the big selector stick, followed by equally natural down flicks, and some subsequent up flicks, before again settling down to a cruise back in A with another, final left flick.
So, there it is: stay in A but still with a suggestion to at least use M occasionally. Why? It’s fun, for one, and it comes with the challenge to sharpen your stick skills even more. In M mode, you can pop out of gear and into neutral while rolling, sure, but you can’t get back into gear without coming to a full stop and keeping your foot on the brake. So you lose that old crutch of being able to coast along while you’re uncertain what gear you should be in. And this is good. A professional driving and race instructor, two of them actually, kept drilling me on the wisdom of staying in gear all the time. Driving the AMT in M mode, the absence of a clutch pedal being fortunate in more ways than one, trains you up to do just that.
Once described as having richly-featured though quirky products, particularly after the launch of their esoteric N1 and N3 models with manually and electronically swiveled main cameras, respectively, OPPO seems to be hitting its stride with their more recent, closer to mainstream introductions. After launching the Mirror 5 and introducing Sarah Geronimo as their brand ambassador in August, OPPO now heralds September with the official roll-out of their R7 series last week, bringing a pair of large-screened models that are focused on the business-end of the market in more ways than one.
Let’s face it, there really isn’t much you can do on the aesthetics front, not with Android and iPhone slab-surfaced handsets that could double as coasters. So OPPO is on the right track with these phones that exude sharp engineering and studied craftsmanship as much by feel as they do by sight. The series’ highlights center on exceptional camera sub-systems, premium build-quality with structure and sheathing heavy on metal alloy material, and privacy and reliability touches that’d make you think these are intended both for corporate floors and for conflict zones.
Both models feature full-metal constructions that let the aluminum-magnesium alloy bodies double as antennas. And, with OPPO’s VOOC flash charging available on both models, minutes-worth of charging can keep you on the go for long and heavy hours … hard bodies and long legs on both these phones.
The R7 Plus, the bigger of the two models, is phablet-sized with a 6″ 1080p screen and has features that make it a credible laptop replacement for the traveling power-user. With this large smartphone in my hip or coat pocket, I’d think twice before adding an actual computer to my go-bag. When cycling through numerous transport arrangements, the benefits of a laptop, with its physical keyboard and other full-sized features, are tangibly diminished by its heft.
At PhP21,990, the R7 Plus could very well cost as much, or even more, than a run-of-the-mill laptop, but you’d actually be paying for the utility of a go-anywhere if somewhat miniature workstation. And that 4100mAh Li-polymer battery it has is an welcome companion when making the most of quiet and anonymous on-board and in-lounge moments, sparing you from the distraction of having to hunt down an AC outlet.
Specifications: R7 Plus
Display: 6.0″ Arc Edge Screen (1920×1080 pixels)
Main camera: Autofocus 13MP RGBW sensor with fast (0.3sec) active laser focusing and dual-LED subject illumination
Secondary camera: Fixed-focus 8MP
Operating system: ColorOS 2.1 (based on Android 5.1)
Processor: Qualcom 615 octa-core at 1.5GHz
Memory: 3GB RAM
Security: finger-print scanner for validation of critical access and operations
Storage: 32GB flash storage, expandable by as much as 128GB with microSD card
Power: 4100mAh fixed lithium-polymer battery with VOOC flash charging
Now the smaller R7 Lite with its still-large 5″ 720p screen and its PhP13,990 list price is more of an everyday carry, something that’ll do nicely when workdays tend to keep you away from your more capable though full-sized gear. There’s the emphasis on imaging assets with camera optics bearing Schneider-Kreuznach’s imprimatur and fast, though passive, phase-detection autofocus (PDAF). From framing to capture, the fraction of a second turnaround is reported to be fast enough for action shots. And, if you need to output print-quality photos, the R7 Lite has OPPO’s Ultra-HD mode for stitching up and cranking out 50mp images off its raw 13mp sensor suite.
Specifications: R7 Lite
Display: 5.0″ HD (720×1080)
Main camera: 13MP with fast phase-detection autofocus (PDAF)
Secondary camera: Fixed-focus 8MP
Operating system: ColorOS 2.1 (based on Android 5.1)
Processor: Qualcom 615 octa-core at 1.3GHz
Memory: 2GB RAM
Storage: 16GB flash storage, expandable by as much as 128GB with microSD card
Power: 2320mAh fixed lithium-polymer battery with VOOC flash charging